Can Science Explain Everything?

train-789634_1920 pixabay crop
Pixabay

A mathematician, a judge and an ambassador walked onto a train. It sounds like the beginning of a joke but the mathematician was John Lennox, who is well-known for his lectures about Christianity, and his new friends were completely serious about their investigation of his beliefs. We don’t know what happened in the end, but all three of them clearly recognised the significance of the conversation.

John told this story at the end of his recent book, Can Science Explain Everything?, for one reason – the way he ended up having that discussion in the first place. He was taking the train from Hungary to Vienna, and as he took his reserved seat in a second-class carriage he had a distinct sense that he should be somewhere else. The only alternative was first class, so he walked up the train towards the first class carriages. Picking the newest-looking carriage, he found that his legs just wouldn’t move in that direction and started panicking, thinking he was having some kind of seizure. Finding that his legs would move in the direction of the older-looking first class carriage, he dived inside and found himself sitting next to two very eminent people whose car had just broken down.

These circumstances are only surprising if you think God can’t act in the world. Science can explain how John’s physiology was working at the time: the process of walking, of taking decisions, and maybe even the reason why his legs failed him when he tried to get into the shiner of the two carriages. On the other hand, science cannot explain the ultimate reason why any of these events happened, or why John did what he did.

My explanation, on theological grounds, is that here was someone well-used used to the idea that God acts in the world. He believed, and had experienced, that God can guide us to act in certain ways – by undramatic as well as dramatic means – and had been choosing to seek and obey God’s will since he was a young man. This means that God has been able to use John in unique and remarkable ways, and he in turn has had the privilege of being part of God’s work on earth.

Interestingly, John didn’t say whether science came up in the conversation. It may not have, and it certainly wasn’t part of why I became a Christian, for example. These people may have already grasped the answer to the question ‘Can Science Explain Everything?’ that is explained so clearly in John’s book. They were ready to have what I think is the more interesting and important conversation about what God’s presence – especially in the person of Jesus – means for our lives, which is subject of the last two chapter of the book.

In an ideal world, the first eight chapters would be completely unnecessary because everyone would have studied the history of philosophy of science and the basics of Christian theology. That way, we could start the conversation with the more stimulating question of how being a scientist can enhance faith, and vice versa. But we have some work to do before we get to that place – as the book’s author knows only too well!

Of course the answer to the title of John’s book is “No”, and here are his main arguments why.

  • There are, and have been, many successful scientists who believe in God
  • Science isn’t the only rational way to discover truth about the world
  • Science can answer how, but not ultimately why things are as they are
  • Scientific studies have shown that belief in God is healthy
  • Arguments that science is the only true route to answers to the questions in life are usually either
    1. Circular e.g. If your claim that your brain has been created by a purposeless process, why do you trust it to generate a purpose for your life? Or
    2. Category errors. E.g. Science and God are not completing explanations for the same thing. The God Christians believe in does not live in the gaps of scientific knowledge
  • Can we really say that something (i.e. the Universe) came out of nothing?
  • Science involves faith as well as reason, and Christianity depends on reason as well as faith
  • Genesis 1-3 is not a literalistic explanation of how the world came to be. It does not compete with scientific explanations
  • The universe is not a closed system. God chooses to act in ways other than through the laws of nature, i.e. miracles, when he wishes to do so
  • There is good evidence for Jesus’ existence, the events of his life, and the reliability of the Bible
  • We need to be in relationship with God – it changes lives for the better

I’ve heard John speak a number of times and always find what he says challenging and helpful, and this book is no different We disagree a little on the biology – there are just a few pages in the book that I’d like to edit if I had the chance – but hey, if we all agreed on everything life would be boring! I’m always delighted to know that there are people out there who are dealing with the misunderstandings about God and science, and inviting people to have a more interesting conversation.

occasci_original.2z67pjf2ijuh6epz3m6bhbykcsry6rqyCan Science Explain Everything?By John Lennox, is available from The Good Book Company

 

 

 

 

 

R Bancewicz 2015 mugshot small
© Faraday Institute

Ruth Bancewicz is Church Engagement Director at The Faraday Institute for Science and Religion. She studied Genetics at Aberdeen and Edinburgh Universities, and spent two years as a part-time postdoctoral researcher at the Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology in Edinburgh, while also working as the Development Officer for Christians in Science. Ruth is a trustee of Christians in Science, and a Fellow of their US counterpart – the American Scientific Affiliation.

 

7 thoughts on “Can Science Explain Everything?

  1. djwimago February 8, 2019 / 10:41 am

    Thanks, Ruth. I too have very much appreciated John Lennox–his apologetic writing, debates etc. Being a part of the ELF Apologetics Network in Hungary was–so much more engaging when Dr Lennox participated. I haven’t read his latest book and suspect that I may well wish to make some changes–though probably not for the same reasons. #captivetotheword .

    SDG

    Derek

    Like

  2. Richard Barker February 11, 2019 / 3:31 pm

    Reblogged this on Richard's Watch and commented:
    Thank you Ruth for introducing and summarising another scientist’s account of a significant ‘God-incident’ intruding within three peoples’ lives on the same journey…

    Like

  3. Richard Barker February 12, 2019 / 10:13 am

    Ruth, I believe the timing of your publishing is ‘coincidental’ too, for the reason I’d been unable to blog about what had happened the previous Monday until the afternoon I read your piece.

    It forms, therefore, an excellent introduction to the triple synchronicity I’d encountered that day. In case you may like to read about that (and readers’ apposite remarks) you’ll find it’s the next post after the above re-blog.

    Like

  4. kevingdrendel February 13, 2019 / 10:03 pm

    I appreciate John Lennox for his affable and unflappable way that takes on the and engages the skeptical world. I appreciate you writing about it too!

    Like

Please leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s