Professor Russell Cowburn: Why I am a Christian

Sheldon, the main character in the US sitcom The Big Bang Theory, is funny because he’s an extreme version of the stereotypical physicist. He’s ultra-geeky, as demonstrated by his approach to a popular game: “Scissors cuts paper, paper covers rock, rock crushes lizard, lizard poisons Spock, Spock smashes scissors, scissors decapitate lizard, lizard eats paper, paper disproves Spock, Spock vaporizes rock, and as it always has, rock crushes scissors”. Sheldon’s people skills are not fantastic, and he often upsets his friends. Sheldon: ‘Why are you crying?’ Penny: ‘Because I’m stupid.’  Sheldon: ‘That’s no reason to cry. One cries because one is sad. For example, I cry because others are stupid, and that makes me sad.’ I’m surprised Sheldon has any friends at all.

A real-life physicist, Professor Russell Cowburn, recently spoke at the Faraday Institute’s annual reception for Christians in the sciences in Cambridge. He used Sheldon to illustrate how much more there is to life than physics, or making clever jokes. Russell wants his students and postdocs to do well in their own careers, occasionally reads something other than science, and is quite happy to talk about his faith. In his talk, “I’m a scientist: Seven reasons why I am also a Christian”, he outlined a way of thinking that is radically Biblical but also takes science very seriously.

The Sermon On the Mount By Carl Heinrich Bloch [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
First, he believes that the person of Jesus is the central piece of evidence that demonstrates God’s character. Einstein was not a believer in God, but he did say that he was “enthralled by the luminous figure of the Nazarene… No one can read the Gospels without feeling the actual presence of Jesus. His personality pulsates in every word.” (Saturday Evening Post, 1929). These verses from Matthew are especially striking: “the crowds were amazed at his teaching, because he taught as one who had authority, and not as their teachers of the law”. This was God breaking into this world to show us what he is like, what he has done for us, and what he expects of us. In a sense, Jesus is the piece of experimental evidence that won’t go away, and in the end Russell is convinced by C.S. Lewis’s maxim that based on what we know of Jesus, must be mad, bad, or God.

Second, being a Christian is a great way to live. Jesus modelled a way of serving others that works extremely well, so a church can be a very warm and supportive environment. A focus on being thankful is also very healthy, and ultimately God’s laws are good for us.

Third, and perhaps more controversially, Russell believes the central claims of Christianity are true. It’s perhaps difficult to say that someone’s worldview is not right, but perhaps scientists are more obsessed about truth than those in other academic disciplines – and willing to say if one model fits the available data better than others. Of course we will always have a partial picture of things, both in Christianity and science, but we have to decide what is true and work with it.

pexels. CC0. Public Domain

Fourth, comes creation. Russell studies the physical universe, which he believes is a very natural thing for a Christian to want to do. For example, one of his favourite parts of the Bible is in Revelation, where God’s greatest characteristics are being proclaimed. Top of the list is the physical universe: ‘you created all things, and by your will they were created and have their being’!

The fifth reason is because of rest. Working hard is part of the package of professional science, and Russell has worked a sixty hour week for most of the last two decades. This lifestyle is great while you’re enjoying it, but some scientists reach a point in their career where they feel overwhelmed by the scale of what remains unknown. If one person can only ever master a small part of even our current scientific knowledge, then why work so hard? Ecclesiastes talks about this kind of fatigue: “What do people get for all the toil and anxious striving with which they labour under the sun? …even at night their minds do not rest” and “Of making many books there is no end, and much study wearies the body.” In these moments, it is refreshing to read Matthew 11:28 “Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest”. These verses are among the ones that have inspired Russell to take Sundays off and regenerate for the week ahead.


Sixth, Jesus is an essential mediator between us and God. Jesus’ life, death and resurrection make it possible for us to pray to and worship him with complete freedom and confidence. Finally, Russell is a Christian because he believes he has been called to it. For this reason, he explained, a Christian can be confident that putting their faith in Jesus was not just a good idea generated in isolation. God is involved in that process and will be with them – whether anyone understands why a Christian can be a scientist or not. So for this professor, physics is a very large part of life – but not everything. His faith informs his science, and his science is informed by Christian faith. His work so far suggests that this way of approaching things is very effective.

cowburnProf. Cowburn has research interests in nanotechnology and its application to magnetism, electronics and optics. Before returning to Cambridge in 2010 he held positions at the CNRS Paris, University of Durham and Imperial College London. He is now the Director of Research for the Department of Physics and the founder of two start-up companies and the inventor of the anti-counterfeiting technology ‘Laser Surface Authentication’. He has had over 60 patents granted and is a frequent invited speaker at international conferences. He is the winner of the GSK Westminster Medal and Prize, the Degussa Science to Business Award, the Hermes International Technology Award and the Institute of Physics Paterson Medal and Prize. In 2009 his research was recognised by the European Union by the award of a 2.8 million Euros ERC Advanced Investigator Grant, given only to the highest level of international research.Professor Cowburn was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 2010.

10 thoughts on “Professor Russell Cowburn: Why I am a Christian

  1. Joan Miller August 27, 2017 / 5:22 pm

    Amazing person… Fascinating information. What a great blessing that he gives God all the glory.


  2. maggieatkinson September 7, 2017 / 9:53 am

    He did this talk in Henley last night. Excellent material. We need vocal Christians speaking against new-earth creationism! (YEC)

    I could not understand his answers to 2 questioners though asking the same thing from a YEC and a sceptic angle. He maintained the earth was indeed made very good, that the suffering from evolution (cancers, parasites, etc) was not part of the very good first plan, but also that mankind’s rebellion against God was responsible. He said the issue was resolved by ‘timing’. But this does not make sense to me. He had to dash off immediately after the Q&A. Can you ask him about this?


    • Ruth M. Bancewicz October 4, 2017 / 9:31 am

      Thanks Maggie, I forwarded on the question to Russell but I guess he didn’t have time to reply yet. I’m not sure what he was driving at in talking about timing. There are quite a few theories about how suffering came into the world, and I’m not sure any of them are totally
      helpful in the end. I’d recommend Bob White’s book ‘Who is the Blame’ and also Sharon Dirckx’s ‘Why’


      • maggieatkinson October 4, 2017 / 10:28 am

        Thanks Ruth. Yes, we got Russell’s email address from the event hosts (with his permission) and we emailed the question. He has not replied even though we just asked for a pointer rather than a treatise.

        White’s book does not seem relevant to the question from the summary. Suffering from evolution is not due to our farming practices, in fact our technology in medicine is the only way out. I heard Sharon Dirckx lecture on this at Ravi Zaracharias ministries in Oxford on a course I did there. She talked about something like the devil being the one who messed up evolution, but that is surely nonsense too – as God made it ‘good’ not with the devil’s corruption and why would a good & all powerful God allow that?

        Do you agree that this is a vital issue? Does it not end Christianity as a coherent faith if it cannot give sensible answers as to what the problem is with the world? A most vital and central question for any worldview


        • Ruth M. Bancewicz October 6, 2017 / 11:56 am

          You’re right, those books are about suffering more generally – which I find to be a more helpful place to start. I think it’s worth looking at the overall answers that Christianity gives to what is wrong with the world, which I agree is a vital issue. The question of suffering and evolution, I feel, needs to be set in that larger framework first.

          I don’t remember Sharon saying that about the devil in her book, but some people do believe in a retroactive effect of the devil’s interference in creation, which I don’t buy myself. I’m not sure if that is what Sharon believes, and her thinking may also have moved on since you heard her because I don’t remember that being in her book.

          In terms of evolution, you could look at Denis Alexander’s ‘Creation or Evolution’, which has a chapter on ‘theodicy’. He explores a few ideas, including the idea that creation is a package deal – if you want a material world operating according to laws of nature, you will experience suffering (but I summarise, you should read it to get the full argument).

          One of the most popular ideas among speakers I’ve heard in recent years is that God gave freedom to creation, and that is where the aspects of nature we find difficult come from. I personally find that one hard to accept in light of what the Bible says about God’s creative activities, but many find it helpful. Chris Southgate, has explored theodicy a lot, so is worth looking at, and Michael Murray too – though I can’t say whether the view I have just mentioned is one of theirs.

          For me, one of the answers may be – what would the world have bene lie without human sin? Our experiences of the painful effects of evolutionary processes might have been completely different.


          • maggieatkinson October 6, 2017 / 7:22 pm

            Thanks, it seems Denis Alexander’s book is the way to go. Russell recommended it in Henley.

            Many thanks for your leads, Best.


  3. Dr. Tim Ellingham October 10, 2017 / 10:57 am

    This article makes no sense, it is just random words with no link from the would-be supernatural world to the real. Merely superficial ramblings followed by the usual apologetic nonsense in the comments. You people waste so much time and effort on twisting and turning an out dated book of fables to try and match reality. Out of all the things you are open to believe why settle on such an incoherent product. If you feel the need to believe in that without evidence you’d be better off creating a less flawed religion from scratch, or just give up the whole wild goose chase and enjoy reality for the limited time you have.
    There is no link between science and religion, neither supports the other.


Please leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s