What Scientists Believe

Biochemistry laboratory By Masur (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0], via Wikimedia Commons
5.8 billion people in the world today are religious, which is nearly 84% of the global population. That figure suggests that it’s fairly likely that at least some of the 4.2 million science and engineering workers around the globe might be religious in some way. Historians, philosophers and theologians tend to say that science and religion don’t have to be in conflict, but sociologists, psychologists and anthropologists see plenty of evidence that in the public imagination the conflict is very much alive. These are just some of the reasons why sociologist Elaine Howard Ecklund wanted to study Religion Among Scientists in International Contexts (RASIC), a project that ran from 2012-2015. At the Faraday Institute course this summer, she presented some of the results, and reflected on what they mean for society.Ecklund and her colleagues were interested in whether the idea that scientists are generally secular has any traction on a global scale. If they are atheists, then what sort of atheism do they hold to? They also wanted to know whether there was any reality behind the idea of a conflict between science and faith, and whether religion ever enters into a scientist’s work?

Research towards better litium-ion batteries. By Brookhaven National Lab. Flickr. (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

Over a period of  four years, Ecklund and her team of researchers looked at biologists and physicists in eight countries: France, Hong Kong, India, Italy, Taiwan, Turkey, the United Kingdom and United States. Out of a potential pool of 61,020 scientists, they sent surveys to 22,525 people, received 9,422 completed surveys, and had face-to-face interviews with 609 of them. The survey questions included professional ethics, science policy, religion, and the role of family and gender in scientific careers. Ecklund and her colleagues are now mining this huge data set to find any overall trends, similarities and differences in people’s approaches to the relationship between science and religion   – both practical and theoretical – in these different contexts.

FDA microbiologist By The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA_Lab_Irvine_3405) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
In every country except Taiwan and Hong Kong, the scientists were less likely to see themselves as religious than the general population: 27% versus 47% in the UK, 30 and 67% in the USA, 16 and 46% in France, 52 and 85% in Italy, 55 and 84% in Turkey, 59 and 77% in India, 39 and 20% in Hong Kong, and 54 and 44% in Taiwan. Those scientists who did identify themselves as religious were far less likely to attend religious services than people in the general population.

The scientists who identified themselves as atheists often fell into three main groups: those who thought of themselves as spiritual (though not religious) people, those who would have liked to have been religious but felt that they couldn’t, and those who remained involved in religious culture in some way.[1] In every country surveyed, around two thirds of the scientists believed that science and faith are either independent or can help each other. Outside of the USA and Europe, scientists were far more likely to believe that science and faith can work together. When religion did enter the scientific forum, it was often to do with someone religious emigrating into a less religious culture, questions of ethics, or interactions with the general public. In France and the US in particular, scientists tended to feel the pressure to privatise their beliefs.

Scientists at work by Nestle. Flickr. (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

Interestingly, Ecklund reported that younger scientists were a little more likely to be religious than older ones.[2] Is this because some scientists find their beliefs change as their careers progress, or are we seeing a generational effect? Are younger people today more open to faith in general than their parents? The evidence so far from this study points to the latter. In terms of subjects, whether there is a difference between scientist’s beliefs seems to depend on the context. Physicists turned out to be more religious in general than biologists in the UK, but not the USA or Italy.[3]

Overall, the survey is encouraging in one way. It is clear that scientists are a fairly diverse group of people, some of whom will no doubt be open to a discussion of religion in public life. On the other hand, the underrepresentation of faith groups in science is worrying. Are young people being put off science because of their religious beliefs? Once in scientific careers, are people more likely to struggle with their faith or find they don’t have time to be part of a religious community? There is more work to be done here to support both scientists in their professions, and young people as they make career choices. A couple of publications from the study will soon available (see below), and more will no doubt follow soon – watch Elaine’s website for details.

  • Ecklund, Elaine Howard, David R. Johnson, Christopher P. Scheitle, Kirstin R.W. Matthews, and Steven W. Lewis, “Religion among Scientists in International Context: Methods and Initial Results from a New Cross-National Survey of Scientists,” forthcoming, Socius (2016).
  • Vaidyanathan, Brandon, Simranjit Khalsa, and Elaine Howard Ecklund, “Gossip as Social Control: Policing Informal Ethical Violations in Scientific Workplaces in the US, UK, and India,” forthcoming, Social Problems (2016).


[1] This was relatively common for the UK, because some people liked to attend church services even though they did not believe in God.

[2] The difference is not huge, but is statistically significant.

[3] Data for the other countries have not been analysed yet.


Ruth Bancewicz
© Ruth Bancewicz, Nigel Bovey

Ruth Bancewicz is a Senior Research Associate at The Faraday Institute for Science and Religion, where she works on the positive interaction between science and faith. After studying Genetics at Aberdeen University, she completed a PhD at Edinburgh University. She spent two years as a part-time postdoctoral researcher at the Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology at Edinburgh University, while also working as the Development Officer for Christians in Science. Ruth arrived at The Faraday Institute in 2006, and is currently a trustee of Christians in Science.

3 thoughts on “What Scientists Believe

  1. lambdamoses September 9, 2016 / 3:41 am

    I borrowed this idea from David Bentley Hart. I wonder if the popular perception that God is greater in magnitude than other beings but not in ontology, that nature can run on its own independently from God, and that physical processes lack inherent purpose is a reason why scientists tend to be more secular in the West, which has a Christian tradition, and Turkey, which has an Islamic tradition. For India, Hinduism is still theistic, so this deistic theology might be relevant. I think it’s possible that this deistic, but non-Biblical and non-Quranic concept, plus scientism and scriptural literalism, make many people struggle with faith when it comes to science. Indeed, while evolution is not well accepted in the Islamic world, it’s a popular practice to find scientific “miracles” in the Quran while the function of those verses of interest is clearly not scientific.

    Also, what are the religions of those religious scientists in Hong Kong and Taiwan? This is a very interesting question. Buddhism and Taoism might face different challenges from science than Abrahamic traditions (but to be honest, from what I learnt about Buddhism and Taoism, I can find something that can be ontologically identified as God, though it’s not perceived as personal as in Abrahamic traditions, but few people care about ontology these days), but recently Christianity spread very rapidly in China (I mean including Mainland, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macau). Perhaps Chinese Christian scientists just perceive Christianity differently from their Western counterparts. Chinese churches tend to be huge, and I went to Hong Kong to take the SAT, and found that there’re many Christian schools. Another factor (I don’t know how important it is) might be unlike Europe and Turkey, China did not have a strong history of theocracy, even though there have been religious persecutions (like against Buddhism and Catholicism), so religiosity is not culturally perceived as much as the “convention”. I have a perception that scientists (me included) tend to have personalities that make them more likely to question convention. In fact, this kind of personality had a role for me to convert Islam from atheism in Communist China and to swim against the flow and become more religious in the secularizing environment of the US. Well, these are just my hypotheses, and as a molecular biology major, I haven’t got the expertise to test them. This is indeed a complicated issue.

    Another question: Does religiosity among scientists tend to correlate with ethnicity and/or gender in any of the region investigated? And in the case of India, caste? Also, can it be that among religious scientists, the representation of different religions is a little different from general public? For instance, can it be that in the West, Islam or Buddhism is more represented among religious scientists than in general public, while in Turkey and India, Christianity?


    • Ruth M. Bancewicz September 9, 2016 / 5:01 pm

      Interesting thoughts Lambdamoses, thank you! Unfortunately Elaine didn’t give the details you ask for – we’ll just have to wait for her work to be published.


Please leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s