Brain Activity and Awareness of God

© env1ro,

This month’s guest writer is Tim Middleton, a DPhil student in the Earth Sciences department at Oxford University. Here he writes about the interface between neuroscience, medicine and and spirituality.

“There was a moment or two almost before the fit itself… when suddenly amid the sadness, spiritual darkness, and depression, his brain seemed to catch fire at brief moments, all his doubts and worries seemed composed in a twinkling, culminating in a great calm, full of sense and harmonious joy and hope… a blinding inner light flooded his soul…” 

This description of the experience of an epileptic fit is from Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s novel The Idiot. Dostoyevsky himself experienced such seizures and they clearly had a significant influence on his life. For him, it didn’t matter whether it was epilepsy or not, there was a moment of joy that he experienced before a seizure during which he was convinced that God was speaking to him—and he was adamant that he didn’t want this to be taken away.

Dostoyevsky is not alone. Many scientists have tried to diagnose various historical figures as having temporal lobe epilepsy. During his conversion on the road to Damascus, Saint Paul fell to the ground, heard voices, saw hallucinations and suffered temporary blindness. Could he have been having a seizure? Saint Teresa of Avila experienced visions, chronic headaches and loss of consciousness for up to four days. Could she too have been suffering from epilepsy?

In 1970, the psychiatrists Kenneth Dewhurst and A. W. Beard interviewed six patients who had all experienced religious conversion during an epileptic seizure. One patient describes what happened:

 “It was a beautiful morning and God was with me and I was thanking God and I was talking to God… God isn’t something hard looking down on us, God is trees and flowers and beauty and love. God was telling me to carry on and help the doctors here, and I was telling Him back, not aloud, I wasn’t talking to myself, they would call you crackers if they heard that; God was telling me, at last you have found someone who can help you, and He was talking about you, doctor, He was talking about you…”

What are we to make of this? Are these the sad words of a suffering patient or revelation from a religious genius? Maybe they are somewhere between the two—but how would we ever know?

As early as the 1950s a neurosurgeon called Wilder Penfield had operated on conscious patients and used electrical currents to stimulate their temporal lobes. Some patients reported feeling calm, others say that they felt God, and one woman heard the sound of an entire orchestra.

We know that the temporal lobes are important. But just because we can explain how these experiences happen doesn’t necessarily make them any less legitimate. The psychologist William James wrote in his book The Varieties of Religious Experience that:

“To plead the organic causation of a religious state of mind, then, in refutation of its claim to possess superior spiritual value, is quite illogical and arbitrary… none of our thoughts and feelings, not even our scientific doctrines, not even our dis-beliefs, could retain any value as revelations of truth, for every one of them without exception flows from the state of their possessor’s body at the time.”

In other words, everything we think relies on our physical brain. So surely the things people think during epileptic seizures are no different? Why is it that we might be tempted to rank some brain states as more valid than others?

According to William James, and other psychologists since, we know that certain types of people are predisposed to religious experiences: they might be nervous, obsessive or liable to depression. Even more interestingly, five of the six patients described by Dewhurst and Beard were already familiar with religion, having been brought up in religious households as children. This doesn’t diminish the experiences they had, but might it affect how they have subsequently interpreted them?

Clearly, lots of difficult questions remain. Can theology cope with the possibility that God is granting special revelation to those who are suffering from what we call illness? Should we allow epileptics to refuse treatment for potentially life-threatening seizures on the basis that they value them as religious experiences? And how on earth are we to make any judgments whatsoever if we haven’t had these experiences ourselves? A challenging set of questions to be wrestling with.

Further reading/listening

God and the Brain: What neuroscience can teach us about people and God, by Revd. Dr Alastair Coles.

Faraday lectures on Neuroscience & Religion (search for ‘neuro’)

5 thoughts on “Brain Activity and Awareness of God

  1. andrewsercombe January 30, 2014 / 12:06 pm

    Anything that keeps science more honest and curious is good in my book. This article highlights the temptation of researchers to interpret their discoveries via prejudice. Thankfully many don’t and can be relied on that much more. Great article. Let’s stay curious on ‘God’.


  2. brentatkinson February 1, 2014 / 1:11 pm

    Be careful with the phrase “special revelation”. In many theological contexts this refers to the act of God inspiring the Biblical writers with canonical revelation. IF God is speaking to those with illness He is not giving any more revelation with equal weight of scripture.


  3. Richard Hosking February 3, 2014 / 2:38 pm

    Hi Ruth, Interesting questions raised by Tim!

    It’s absolutely true that neuropathology can shed light on normal brain function, but in neurological disease this activity is almost always disordered. William James noted that hyper-religiosity itself can be frankly pathological* – something which the Bible also implies (Deuteronomy 18:21-22, 1 Corinthians 14:19)

    In the Gospels, it’s striking (and somewhat uncomfortable) to note that people who we would diagnose with psychiatric illness, also had a greater awareness of who Jesus was (Luke 8:26-39). However, the final brain state of the chap healed in Luke 8:35 – i.e. of being “clothed, and in his right mind” – was presumably preferable to the first (8:27-29)?!

    The story of Jesus healing a psychological storm immediately follows his calming of a meteorological one (Luke 8:22-25). Research psychiatrist Dan Siegel thinks that brain activity – like the weather – is amenable to analysis by complexity theory.

    Dan believes that most mental illness represents the extremes of either chaos or rigidity – such as in schizophrenia or depression. In contrast, mental well-being is characterised by harmonious integration, something he demonstrates with volunteer ‘complexity choirs’ (who often choose to sing ‘Amazing Grace’!)*

    Sacred choral music provides an opportunity for a coherent personal and collective experience of the transcendent. For Holocaust Memorial Day last week, the BBC screened a documentary about an extraordinary staging of Verdi’s Requiem during World War II.*

    ‘Defiant Requiem’ recounted the deeply moving story of a performance of the Catholic mass for the dead, sung by Jewish prisoners in Theresienstadt concentration camp. Surviving members of the choir recalled how the music lifted them above the degradation and psychopathology that was the Third Reich. It gave them a sense of goodness, beauty, meaning, hope, and of ‘trying to reach something bigger than we are’.


    W.James ‘The Varieties of Religious Experience’ (Penguin Classics 1985) pp. 7-9
    D.Siegel ‘Mindsight’ (Oneworld 2010) pp. 64-76


  4. michala February 3, 2014 / 3:02 pm

    I would ask anyone if they believed in Jesus or/ and UFOs? Obviously, this is open to interpretation with religious/ faith/ scientific it all in the mind? Or is it mind over matter or mass delusion? Its not simply science v faith.there appears to be answers in the Bible but also unclear meanings with parables and whether for example Genesis ( creation)is based on actual facts or myth or any historical/ geological/ scientific merits?indeed not all myth is false it may or may not have occurred that way.what you choose to believe is down to the individual.indeed when in doubt or bemused by the various different meanings in the Bible you should take scripture by faith alone ( Hebrews 11)therefore a true Christian /scientist should keep an open mind when considering the Bible and scientific theories.


  5. Tim Middleton February 3, 2014 / 10:42 pm

    Thanks for the note on ‘special revelation’. You’re quite right: I didn’t mean to imply the strict theological meaning of the phrase.

    Thanks too for sharing Dan Siegel’s ideas.


Please leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s